MSNBC intelligence expert: WikiLeaks is releasing falsified emails not really from Hillary Clinton
The latest release from WikiLeaks, a collection of emails supposedly hacked from the account of Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, is getting very little public attention due to the fact that it contains nothing particularly scandalous to begin with, and the fact that it was released just as Donald Trump‘s campaign was imploding in a sexual assault scandal. But those who have examined the Clinton email dump have found something fascinating: several of the emails aren’t real, and aren’t even good forgeries.
Malcolm Nance, a U.S. intelligence expert and MSNBC analyst, has issued what he’s calling an “official warning.” He’s reporting that the emails in question “already proving to be riddled with obvious forgeries” and goes on to add that they’re “not even professionally done.” Nance announced his conclusion via Twitter just a few hours after the supposed emails were released. MSNBC host Joy-Ann Reid retweeted his warning, adding “FYI” to her own audience.
WikiLeaks had spent the past month claiming that it would be releasing election-altering hacked information on Hillary Clinton which would cost her the election. But the bizarre advance hype, coupled with repeated delays and a surreal middle-of-the-night press conference last week in which absolutely no information was revealed, suggested that they had nothing all along.
This evening’s email dump, which appears to have been specifically timed on a Friday evening in order to avoid the scrutiny of the major media outlets, has revealed relatively little of interest. Some of the emails purport to contain the transcripts of Hillary Clinton’s Wall Street speeches, but use odd phrases such as “and/or” which would not have been included in the original prepared text of a speech and would not have been spoken out loud by someone giving a speech. If you enjoy Daily News Bin, consider making a contribution:

So according to this a Mr. Nance “announced his conclusion via Twitter just a few hours after the supposed emails were released.” and then MSNBC host Joy-Ann Reid retweeted his warning, adding “FYI” to her own audience. This is exactly the proof that the media is in collusion with Hillary. No real expert would be able to conclude in just a few hours of looking at the email dump that they are fake – This is a fake calling fake.
No wonder you declare wikileaks a fake after you and your supposed “journalists” are busted colluding with Killary! I’m sharing with everyone that MSNBC cannot be trusted and not to watch.
The emails are real, Hillary herself has confirmed it by answering at least two questions during the debates directly from the leaked emails.
Funny thing is the questions were about things that happened sometime ago yet Hillary Clinton remembered them right down to the paragraph yet Hillary Clinton can’t remember a darned thing when it comes to her corruption by saying she can’t recall or I don’t remember repeatedly including 39 times to the FBI.
Uh-huh. Sure. Of course, we believe you, MSNBC. What possible reason could you have to discredit Wikileaks?
I don’t know why a privately owned corporation with a vested interest in discrediting these emails would employ someone who would verify their authenticity, there’s your first problem. Secondly, verifying these emails has nothing to do with “intelligience” and everything to do with cyber security. That being the case, an actual cyber security expert had this to say:
https://www.google.com/amp/ijr.com/wildfire/2016/10/720250-dnc-chair-claims-damning-leaked-emails-were-doctored-a-cyber-security-expert-just-demolished-her-cop-out/amp/?client=safari
So, this is easily solved: John Podesta should release his entire email archive so that the public can judge for themselves, not some paid political hack from a Democratic Party news organization like MSNBC.
Easy peasey!
Btw, for the person who wrote this, what makes these Wikileaks emails so damaging isn’t that they somehow out actual criminal activity (though, based on the FBI’s decision today, maybe not!)…
…it’s that these emails reveal the Clinton’s closest aides as frankly some of the worst people you will ever meet. These emails reveal what these people are saying about you behind your back.
That’s why they’re almost certainly not “faked” “by the Russians”.
Btw, one last point, if the Russians did hack Podesta’s email and somehow manipulate them…isn’t that why operating a “private” email server to conduct government business and send classified around is illegal in the first place?
Indeed, it is!
They weren’t hacked from Hillary, hence John Podesta leaked emails. Scintillating observation
This is total bull shit and we know it. Do they really believe America is that stupid to believe the information is made up? Nobody can make the leaks up, it’s all valid and you people lie and lie because you’re bought and paid for! Any reputable media outlet would state the facts and REPORT on it instead of covering which is aiding and abetting a criminal which there are charges for. I hope you ALL get exposed, lose credibility and viewership and DO get charged for colluding with a criminal! All the news media is pathetic! Can’t even get the weather right half the time! So all that you have left is sports which taking a knee to our flag by overpaid crybabies viewership has also declined. By the way…God Bless America and have a good night!
Wow isn’t it great they found out the emails were fake the day they leaked all the reporters that were owned by Hillary? Talk about luck!
This is my first time pay a visit at here and i
am truly pleassant to read everthing at alone place.